If you guessed, Jeff "Maddog" Madsen, you guessed right!

In case you can't tell by this picture, Jeff is thrilled to be playing Court Jester to Mr. Sebok this summer.

In addition to sporting these fine outfits, Jeff and Gav will also be carrying Sebok in on a throne tomorrow. Stay tuned for details.

Make sure to bug Stapes to get those gift certificates.  It usually takes four of five emails/phone calls before he responds so don't give up.

^{1Gift Certificate good for 1/2 off a windshield washer topoff.*3}

^{2 If you actually clicked the "read more" button to see the picture, you are automatically disqualified from the contest.}

^{3 Not to exceed 2 fl. oz.}

JS: What’s the secret of playing blind and being good at it?

JM: Well, the key is raising blind with big hands.  It’s actually not that hard, once you get to my level of ability.

JS: Have you ever played blind at a final table?

JM: Of course.  I do that a lot.  How do you think I won two bracelets?

JS: Can you give me an example?

JM: If action is passed to you on the button, why bother looking at your cards?  Especially if you’re the chip leader.  Which I usually am.

JS: What tips would you give David Singer on how to become a better blind player?

DS: I would probably be better off playing blind!

JM: (laughs) Sure.  Just don’t overdo it until you have practiced for awhile.

DS: I don’t think I can do it.  Are there any baby steps I can take?
 
JM: Sometimes you should look at only one card.  If it’s an ace, you should always raise.

DS: What is someone plays back at me?

JM:  If someone plays back at you, don’t look at your other card.  If you do, it will probably be a four. 

DS: So I should fold?

JM: No way! If you don’t look at it, the odds are it’s another ace, or every once in a while it’s a king.  Instead, you should just go all in.

JS: So what were the exact hands you played blind during the rebuy period?

JM: Well, I raised to 300 under the gun without looking, another guy went all in and then the button went all in for about the same amount.  I was going to call the first guy in the dark because he went all in every hand anyway, but once the other guy called I had to look.  I actually had jacks, and they won against queen-nine and ace-queen.

JS: How are you sitting in chips right now?

JM: I’m in great shape.  I have 20k but only had to do one rebuy when I ran aces into kings.

JS: You mean kings into aces?

JM: No, I made a mistake and looked at both cards.  Because I did that he ended up hitting a set of kings.  Totally misplayed by me.

JS: Alright, David, thanks for the tip about Jeff.  Good luck guys.  And, just so you know, I'm probably going to make up a lot of this interview when I post it on the web.  I'm not kidding, so don't be surprised when you get a few phone calls or emails wondering why you said some of the stuff you did.  Call it "editorializing."  It's all about the readers.

First to the math. I ran a bunch of hands through twodimes, and came to this conclusion: If you can tell the difference between a playable hand and a piece of garbage, chances are you’ve got no more than 60 percent pot equity preflop and no less than 40 percent. Of course, some oddities come up, where you can end up with a hand that’s completely dominated, but that’s a pretty rare case.

So if you’re holding a playable hand, anything from A-K-2-3 to 9-T-J-Q you should be trying to see a flop. As I watched the great players, I saw that they (and their tablemates) often limped. Contrast this to hold ‘em, especially late tournament hold ‘em, where limping is pretty rare. But this makes sense because in hold ‘em a player can possess (or represent) a hand that is 3 to 1 or 4 to 1 favorite against all comers. In PLO-8, the best you represent is a marginal favorite: the equivalent of A-T vs. K-Q.

A good example of a spot when limping then calling a raise was appropriate came up between Brett Jungblut and a player I didn’t recognize. Brett limped UTG, and the player to his left raised pot, thereby committing about 70 percent of his chips. Brett called and the two saw a flop of Ac-Jc-9c. Brett checked, looked at the inevitable all-in bet, then thought before folding, face-up, A-2-3-4 with the two red suits. His opponent showed a set of Aces.

When I plugged the competing hands into twodimes, you can see the reason in Jungblut's play:

Ad-2d-3h-4h vs. Ac-As-Tc-Js is a dead heat, 50/50 pot equity.
Ad-2d-3h-4h vs. Ac As 8c 5s, gives AA a 55-45 pot equity edge.

Even in a total nightmare match up, the situation isn’t all that dire:

Ac As 2c 3s vs. Ah 2d 3h 4d gives Aces a 67-32 equity advantage.

Yesterday, I made a clear tactical mistake. I made a few raises with decent hands in favorable position. Almost every time I found myself in a difficult spot, facing re-raises or looking at flops that had no relation whatsoever to my hand. I lost a lot more chips in these spots than I needed to.

The other major point that I took from both my play and my observations concerned the play of good but vulnerable hands when out of position. For example, yesterday, with blinds of 100 and 200, two players limped; the small blind (a stone) didn’t complete, and three of us saw a flop of Ad-Jd-7c. I held A-J-X-X. I bet out the pot and was called in one spot. The turn was the Qd. I checked, and then folded.

When I talked through the hand with a friend, he asked me what card I would have liked to have seen on the turn. The 9s would have been nice, we decided, but other than that there’s almost no clean card in the deck. Any paint would raise the potential of Broadway; any low card could but me in spot where I was playing for half the pot.

I saw Chau Giang enter a similar situation from the big blind. It was limped in two spots and the small blind completed. On a flop of K-J-2, two spades, Chau bet pot and was called in one spot. The turn was the Qh, and Chau checked, and his opponent bet enough for Chau to make a call for his tournament life. Chau folded and his opponent showed a hand, AA, that he said he could beat.

These are tough spots that are sometimes unavoidable, but I wonder if I (or Chau) could have looked for check raises that sealed the action. I guess what I learned here is that, if at all possible, avoid hitting two pair on a draw heavy board – or something like that.

Any advice for playing these sorts of hands from pokerwire’s readers is welcome. Leave a comment.