Tags
    

Auto Refresh: Off (Turn On)

Currently Viewing Articles tagged with, author:Storms Reback

Where the 2007 WSOP Ranks in Its Storied History


Author: Storms Reback Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 00:36:50 on Jul 16, 2007

Last month I wrote a piece complimenting the tournament staff for remedying the problems of 2006 and keeping the ship afloat and pointed in the right direction in 2007. One reader commented that I was “seeing things through seriously rose-tinted lenses,” but his objections to my argument seemed laughable to me then and, upon revisiting them, still do now. Even though he had yet to set foot inside the Rio, he labeled the present state of the World Series as “very corporate, very soulless.” Well, here’s the reality: a corporation owns and runs the World Series of Poker, hence it’s always going to feel corporate. That doesn’t, however, mean it has to feel soulless. For me, the real question is: what kind of experience is Harrah’s providing for players and fans in return for the healthy amount of juice they earn for hosting each event?

I have to give Harrah’s very high marks for the way they have addressed past problems each year. In 2005 the major complaints were mostly about infrastructure, long lines at the bathrooms and the inaccessibility of food. In 2006 Harrah’s trucked in a bunch of Porta-Potties and created the Poker Kitchen. The biggest complaints that year were that there were too many no-limit hold’em events relative to the number of other events, an average day in the H.O.R.S.E. tournament was way too long, and more tables were needed. Harrah’s addressed these issues in 2007 by adding a bunch of non-no-limit hold’em events to the schedule, expanding the H.O.R.S.E. tournament to five days, and creating the Poker Pavilion out back where the Poker Kitchen used to be.

Harrah’s has done an even better job this year as they were able to take care of many problems on the fly instead of waiting a year to address them. During the first week of the Series there were incredibly long lines just to enter certain events. By Week Two that was no longer an issue. The new cards implemented this year were quickly found to be seriously lacking… so Harrah’s immediately replaced them with better cards. Yes, the food in the Poker Kitchen got no better (and many would argue worse), but all the food inside the Rio sucks so where do you expect them to find better fare? Besides, most of the poker players I know aren’t exactly culinary experts. Give them an ass-meat burger and a Red Bull and they’re perfectly happy.

The biggest problem I had with Harrah’s this year was their creation of the sequestered tent, which I have already written about several times. It’s hard to defend this as anything more than one more way for them to make a buck—by not allowing fans or media to watch the action at these final tables they’re able to charge people to watch the coverage online. As a member of the media I have an especially big problem with this. My job is to write about these tournaments. I would have loved to have written about Phil Hellmuth winning his 11th gold bracelet, about the reaction on his face when he won the last hand or the things he did when he stood up from the table and moved off-camera, but I wasn’t allowed to. Sure, I could go back and watch the footage, but it’s not the same. Writing about an event through the filter of a television or computer screen dilutes the experience.

As good a job as Harrah’s has done in 2007, there are still plenty of aspects of the World Series that need to be fixed. Here are some suggestions of what I think should be done this “off season”:

Scrap the sequestered tent. I have already given my reasons above. If they don’t scrap it, may I suggest they simply remove the black cloth. That way, fans and media could watch the action in real time, and Harrah’s could still charge people to watch the action on their computers. If someone is willing to pay $50 (or whatever it is) to watch the final table of a poker tournament, they’re not going to spoil the occasion by following the action on someone’s blog.

Address the spectator issue. Two years ago, too many fans were allowed inside the Amazon Room during the main event and it made life difficult for everyone involved: players, media, tournament officials, as well as other fans. This year, not enough fans (or at least the right ones) were allowed inside the room and they all left pissed off. I think there should be a lottery for the general public that would allow a few lucky ones the right to watch the ESPN final table. That way, there would at least be a system in place instead of the mayhem that ensued this year. Some fans waited in line for an hour, only to get kicked out of the tournament room after ten minutes once the action came to a break. I would also allow each player one guest pass so they could have a wife or brother or friend watch them. For $10,000, that only seems fair.

Institute a more specific cell phone rule and enforce it.
Nothing caused more confusion for the players and dealers. The problem with the present rule is that it leaves a lot of room for confusion. If you’ve just folded your hand, can you then talk on the phone? Can you send or receive a text message while a hand is going on? Dealers rarely said anything to players about their phone use until the David Singer Incident. On occasion I saw a dealer say something to a player using his phone, but generally they seemed to ignore it. A part of me wouldn’t mind seeing cell phones banned from the room entirely. Imagine this scenario. A player keeps his phone on vibrate in his pocket and whenever a confidante believes he should fold a big hand that friend calls him and lets it ring twice. Don’t think that some players haven’t tried to do something like this. As long as poker has existed, there has been cheating, and nothing makes cheating easier than technological devices such as cell phones.

Tournament structure. Last year, the players asked to be given more play so the tournament officials doubled the size of the players’ starting stacks. While this appeared to be an excellent solution, it was actually a charade because the starting limits were also doubled. In effect, nothing was done. If they really want to give the players more play, they should keep the starting stacks where they are now and cut down the size of the initial limits. For the main event this would mean going back to $25/$25 blinds or at the very least $25/$50 instead of $50/$100.

Expand and take over the room next door. The Poker Pavilion hasn’t been the greatest success. No player has been happy to discover that he’s starting one of the events in what amounts to a playground in Brooklyn when his compatriots are playing in Madison Square Garden. Whenever the air conditioning wasn’t working optimally, which seemed to happen a lot, the tent quickly grew very hot. Although the temperature was supposedly quite cool when Eskimo Clark had his first stroke at the table, if it had happened during one of the warm spells the press would have had a field day. Can you say, lawsuit? With or without the Pavilion, there’s a serious need for more room. Let me suggest that during the main event the tournament be allowed to take over the giant room next door. Hold the Gaming Expo a week earlier (or scrap it altogether) and let half the starting field play in this room. This would allow Day One of the tournament to be finished in two days instead of four and would allow for a smoother experience in general. I can already hear the argument against this idea, and it centers around money. Harrah’s can charge a pretty penny for use of that other room and using it would require them to buy 200-300 more poker tables and hire that many more dealers and staff, but oh how nice it would be for the rest of us. 

As much as I would love the Poker Kitchen to serve gourmet fare, I’m not going to waste my breath. I’m also not going to spend any time discussing one of the most important issues to emerge in the poker world in the past several years: players’ rights. The World Poker Association seems to be gaining more power with each passing day, and hopefully they will continue to look after their own. In a Series where one player nearly died at the table and refused to stop playing (Eskimo Clark) and another seemed to be mimicking the demise of Stu Ungar (Vinny Vinh), it’s become more apparent than ever that the players need someone to protect their interests. I believe Harrah’s understands what an amazing event it inherited from the Binion family and will continue to do everything it can to make sure that the quality of the experience improves from year to year. Hopefully, Clark and Vinh will still be around next year to enjoy it.

1 Comment

Why a Pro Won’t Win the 2007 WSOP


Author: Storms Reback Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 00:27:29 on Jul 13, 2007

This is the new reality of the main event of the World Series of Poker: the pros are the underdogs. It seems almost blasphemous to say, but it’s true. If I was to bet on who this year’s winner is going to be, I wouldn’t pick Gus Hansen or Carlos Mortensen or Lee Watkinson or J.C. Tran or Huck Seed or Robert Mizrachi (all of whom are still very much alive). I would bet on the Field, that nameless faceless mass of amateurs who combined still have less experience at the tables than Doyle Brunson. Why the pessimism?

Let me count the ways:

Sheer Numbers. To win the 2007 main event, the eventual champion is going to have to outlast and outplay 6,357 other players. Of the 6,358 players who entered the event, maybe 300 of them are pros whose names you recognize. That means the amateurs outnumber the pros 20-1. For every Erick Lindgren or Allen Cunningham there are twenty Ethan Steinbergs from Jackson, Wyoming (I’m using him as an example because he’s my buddy and he’s still alive on Day Three). Imagine if the starting field at the British Open numbered 6,000. How would you like Tiger Woods’ chances then? Yes, at this point in the tournament many of the fish have been swallowed, but many still remain. The amateur/pro ratio has surely dropped from 20-1, but it’s still quite high. Out of the 808 players remaining to start the day, I’d say roughly 100 of them were pros. That means the amateur/pro ratio is 8-1. That’s a lot better than 20-1, but still not great. I’m predicting that one big name will make the final table like Allen Cunningham did last year. At that point he (or she) will be up against eight amateurs. While experience is obviously an important factor, there’s still a lot of luck in poker. Unless that pro enters the final day with the chip lead, I don’t see him (or her) taking home the bracelet.

Exhaustion. Many of the amateurs in the main event didn’t play in any of the preliminary events. They’ve been home sleeping in their own beds, resting up for the biggest poker tournament of their lives. They’ve probably been eating well—at the very least they haven’t been subsisting on the ass-meat the Poker Kitchen calls a hamburger. They have probably played in the occasional home game or a few hours a day online, but that’s it. Meanwhile, the pros have been here for six weeks playing poker every single day. Many of them have made Day Twos in dozens of events, which means they’ve put in 14-hour workdays but not necessarily made any money doing it. Many of them have even played in two events at the same time, entering a new event while still battling it out on a Day Two of another. Many of the top players stay at their homes in Las Vegas or at the Bellagio so they’ve been living comfortably, but a high percentage of them have been staying here at the Rio, so close to the action that sleep becomes an afterthought. In short, they’re exhausted. Chris Ferguson is usually one of the more upbeat players I know. He’s always laughing about something. But when I saw him on the eve of the main event he was falling asleep at his table during the $5,000 2-7 lowball event, which may explain why he’s already busted from the main event.

Crazy play. You see certain plays in the main event you just don’t see in other poker tournaments: players risking all their chips on total bluffs, others willing to call big raises with nothing more than bottom pair. Many pros find it easier to play against other pros. Amateurs can often be enigmatic to them. How can you get a read on someone if even he doesn’t know what he’s thinking?

The luck factor
. When Johnny Chan won his second world championship in 1988, he had to survive 12 coinflip situations. There were only 167 players entered in the main event that year. Imagine how lucky you have to get to survive a field of 6,358? And it’s not just the race situations you have to win. With thousands of hands being played each hour, we have seen some pretty amazing ones this year. Usually set over set is considered the ultimate cooler. You flop a set of 7s and put all your money in the pot, only to discover that your opponent flopped a set of jacks. Well, how about quads over quads (which actually happened the other day)? Or having your opponent make a royal straight flush (which also happened)? No matter how good of a player you are, there’s nothing you can do in these situations. All you can do is hope they don’t happen to you.

While I think it would be great for poker if Carlos Mortensen won his second championship six years later or Gus Hansen added a World Series title to the three WPT wins he already has, I just don’t see it happening. I’m putting my money on Ethan Steinberg and the rest of the amateurs in the field.

1 Comment

No R-E-S-P-E-C-T at the 2007 WSOP


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 16:54:58 on Jul 11, 2007

On my way back into the Amazon Room last night I found the entrance by the main cage clogged with people. A short balding man with glasses was holding up the line. He had a woman at his side, and they were trying to talk their way into the room, but the security guard wasn’t having any of it. I started to step around the couple—my media badge is like an EZ pass on the highway—when I noticed who it was: Robert Varkonyi and his wife, Olga.

 
“Are you a player?” the security guard asked Varkonyi.

“Yes, I am.”

“Then where’s your wristband.”

“I’m not playing right now.”

“Then you can’t come in.”

All Series long, the top pros have enjoyed unfettered access inside the Amazon Room. They can go anywhere they want whenever they want. Uninvited, Phil Hellmuth stepped onto the stage at the final table of the $10,000 Pot-Limit Omaha event to wish Doyle Brunson good luck in his attempt to win his record-tying eleventh gold bracelet. Scotty Nguyen, Phil Laak, and Humberto Brenes seemed to pop their heads into the Media Room on a regular basis. Now a former world champion was being prevented from simply walking the aisles and watching his peers play from the rail.

I had to say something. “He’s a friggin’ world champion,” I told the security guard. “For christ’s sakes, let him in.”

The security guard looked Varkonyi over once again, not quite believing what he’d just heard. This was no Phil Hellmuth standing before him, no brash tall loud showman. This was no Doyle Brunson, no famous old Texas road gambler. This wasn’t even a Chris Moneymaker, who the security guard would probably have recognized instantly. This was a short balding guy with glasses and an unassuming personality.

Emboldened by his frustration, Varkonyi finally stepped past the security guard into the room and pointed at the twenty-foot-tall picture of himself hanging above the security guard’s head. “See,” he said to the guard. “There I am. Now can I come in?”

A little embarrassed, the security guard nodded and returned to his post at the door.

0 Comments

Dinner Break, Day 2A of 2007 WSOP


Author: Storms Reback Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 02:41:09 on Jul 11, 2007

Today’s portion of the field has been condensed into a cluster of tables that only takes up a third of the space inside the Amazon Room. The players have also been separated into the haves and have nots, the big stacks and those just hanging on and hoping to double up. One of those big stacks belongs to Jared Hamby, who finished second in the Mandalay Bay Poker Championship in May.

Hamby is currently sitting in third place with 380k, thanks in large part to a gift from the poker gods. He raised 4.5k before the flop with aces, Gene Strickland reraised to 17.5k, Hamby made it 28K, and Strickland went all in. Hamby called and Strickland flipped over A-K. Hamby’s aces held up and he had momentarily taken over the chip lead. But soon after that things got a whole lot harder for him. Alex Kravchenko, winner of this year’s $1,500 Omaha Eight or Better bracelet, got moved to his table. He also has to contend with Jon Moondes, an amateur who is en fuego. He pushed his stack to 350k after calling someone’s bluff with pocket queens. “There’s nothing better than stacking chips,” said Moondes after the hand. “It’s better than sex.” Hamby looked skeptical, then said, “In this tournament, maybe.”

One table over one of my surprise picks to go deep, Lasse Aspen Melby, has built a 235k stack. He has been stealing a lot blinds with raises from late position and avoiding disasters. During a single round of play he raised from middle position to 4.5k, the standard opening raise of the last round, and everyone folded to him. On the very next hand he again raised to 4.5k. This time both the small and big blind called. The flop came KcJs9c. It got checked around. The 7h fell on the turn and again all three players checked. When the Kh fell on the river, the small blind bet 7k and the big blind made a crying call. Melby folded, not falling for the trap. The small blind showed jacks, giving him a full house. Melby shrugged. “10 on the river and I have the nuts,” he said, meaning he had A-Q.

Melby appears to be in the zone, but with Joe Beevers at his table he’s going to have to be careful he doesn’t get robbed by the Hendon Mobster. The two nearly got mixed up on a big hand. Melby raised from the cutoff to 4.5k. Random guy with shaggy hair in the small blind called. Beevers then raised 16.5k more. Melby wisely folded. When it got back around to the small blind, he moved all in. Beevers was priced in and called with 10s6s. The small blind showed pocket nines. The board came 5s3c4c3d2c, giving Beevers a winning straight.

For the moment the big stacks seem to be picking on the little stacks and staying away from each other, but that could change at any time. Look for some major shakeups on the leader board as Day 2A enters its second half.

0 Comments

Huck Seed in Good Shape at 2007 WSOP


Author: Storms Reback Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 02:37:50 on Jul 11, 2007

One of the few past champions left in the field, Huck Seed, has 98k at the dinner break. He got a little boost when, after he limped in from early position, the player on his immediate left moved all in for 16.7k more. Seed called and showed pocket 8s. His opponent had pocket 9s. Seed was in bad shape until the flop came Js3c8h. After busting his opponent by making a set on the flop, Seed looked at him sympathetically and said, “Sorry ‘bout that.” It appeared he really meant it too.

Things were a little testier ten feet away at Table 42. As the dealer was dealing a hand, one of the players at the table picked up his cell phone. Believe it or not, it was another French guy! The dealer declared the French guy’s hand dead and all the players at the table agreed that that was fair. French guy protested in not-so-great English and the floor was called over.

Troy Stromer, the floor man, listened to the dealer’s explanation and that of the offending player and decided that the ruling should stand, that the hand was dead. “If you are using your phone in any way,” Stromer said, “your hand will be dead.” Then he explained that the players had been warned that morning and suggested that the French guy, who was still holding his phone, put it away for the night so it wouldn’t happen again.

Back at Seed’s table he called a 6k preflop raise and folded when someone bet the Ac9h7h flop. He then left for the dinner break two and half minutes early. He actually missed one hand, but getting away from the table was obviously more important to him than playing one last hand. He knows what works best for him. After all, he did win the world championship in 1996.

The players have now returned from their dinner break. They were expected to play five levels today, but that schedule has now been amended. If the field is pared down to 350 before the fifth level is over, play will be stopped for the night. The players on Day 2B will have the same schedule. At that point the field will be combined and the frenzy surrounding the money bubble will begin.

0 Comments

Speeding Towards the Money on Day 2A


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 19:31:29 on Jul 10, 2007

Day 2A continues to proceed at a frenetic pace. After losing over 200 players during the first two-hour level, and over 100 since then, only 700 of the 1,037 players who started today are left. They are supposed to play five levels today with a projected finishing time of 2 a.m., but things could get complicated if too many players bust out early. The money bubble can’t be reached until after the field is combined on Thursday.

With so much happening so quickly it’s hard to concentrate on any one table so I have been on the move, jumping from one exciting moment to the next. Perhaps the sickest lineup I came across was the table that seated Jason Lester, Billy Baxter, and Keith Sexton. It’s rare to see two pros at the same table in this amateur-heavy field; three is unheard of. Even more remarkable, these three all got involved in the same hand, but after Baxter raised 10k from middle position Lester and Sexton both folded.

The craziest hand I have seen today (or just about any other day) occurred on table 35. One guy moved all in with pocket sevens and he got called by Steve Seidman who was holding pocket tens. The dealer screwed up and spread a four-card flop: 2d6s7dKc. The player who had flopped a set of sevens was both ecstatic and terrified at the same time. The two players argued over what should be done. Finally, the floor was called over and settled the matter. When a four-card flop gets dealt by accident, the cards get shuffled back into the deck and a new flop gets dealt. The guy with pocket sevens was livid… until the flop came 7dKc9c! He had flopped a set once again and it was nearly the same flop as before! Now it was Seidman’s turn to bitch… until the board finished with two clubs. His 10c gave him a winning flush. Crazy hand.

A hand nearly as dramatic took place moments later a few tables away. After a player raised before the flop, Lasse Aspen reraised to 15k and got called. Last night I played against Aspen in a cash game and I came away extremely impressed. I watched him call an all-in bluff when there was an ace and a flush on board. All Aspen had was pocket queens, but they were good enough to win the massive pot. This kid isn’t very old, but he is a very good poker player. No one’s heard of him here yet because he’s Norwegian and I bet he’s not much older than 21. I am predicting that he will go very deep in this tournament and if he keeps playing poker he should have an excellent career.

On a hand that propelled Aspen near the top of the leader board he reraised his opponent to 15k before the flop. The flop came KcKd10c. Aspen bet 18k and his opponent called. The turn was the Qd. Aspen bet 40k and got called. The Ad fell on the river. Lasse moved all in and his opponent folded. I guess he was trying to make it look like he was bluffing, trying to steal the massive pot, but he wasn’t. He showed his opponent his A-K.

0 Comments

Berry Johnston One of the Bigger Stacks on Day 2A of 2007 WSOP


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 17:43:24 on Jul 10, 2007

Day 2A of the World Series is a welcome change from the craziness of the Day Ones. Those four days added up to the longest day of my life. There is actually room to breathe inside the Amazon Room, and it’s getting more spacious with the passing of each minute. Everywhere I walked during the first level today I heard the heart-pounding cry of “All in and a call!” One of the quietest tables I came across was table number 65. The fact that Berry Johnston, the 1985 world champion and a man known for not wasting words, was sitting there did nothing to change the table’s tranquility.

Johnston provided an interesting contrast to the amateur sitting on his right who was loud in every way. While Johnston wore a white golf shirt under a gray jacket adorned with nothing other than a Full Tilt Poker patch, the amateur sported a multi-colored t-shirt with Bob Marley on it and a camouflage New York Yankees hat worn at a slight angle. I had played against this in a cash game several nights ago and wasn’t impressed by his game. He shoved all in twice in fifteen minutes with nothing more than top pair and lost both times, once to an overpair and later against two pair. After tossing away two buy-ins, he bolted from the game. I am amazed that he survived the first day of this tournament and will be even more shocked if he lasts this one.

The kid does have one amazing skill, and that is his ability to get Johnston talking. At one point the two had a discussion about the money bubble. If the field gets whittled down to 300 today, a possibility considering the many eliminations so far, and the same thing happens tomorrow, how will they determine who gets in the money? 621 players are to get paid. The dealer Lu interjected her opinion but neither player was very interested in it. She tried to make up for this slight by telling a story about how she had dealt quads over quads the previous day. One player had pocket sevens, another pocket threes, and the flop came 7-3-3. They got all their money in and the player with sevens caught a fourth one to win the hand.

Known as much for his conservative play as his taciturnity, Johnston showed a willingness to go against type during a hand just prior to the first break when he played Jh4h from the button. The flop came AsKs3h. It got checked around and another heart fell on the turn. A woman bet 2k and Johnston and one other player called. The river was the Jd. It got checked around again and Johnston won the hand with his pair of jacks.

Right now Johnston has 145k, putting him close to the top of the leader board. Jeff Banghart has 267k. The kid sitting on Johnston’s right has, at best, 30k. I think we all know how this story is going to end, but the kid seems determined to last the day. “I got kids to feed, man,” he told a friend visiting his table.

0 Comments

The Numbers Game


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 22:20:30 on Jul 09, 2007

For weeks, even months, people have been wondering how many players would enter the main event this year. The great unknown in the equation was what effect the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act would have on the numbers. Many speculated that the number of entrants would drop sharply from last year’s record of 8,773 because it was assumed that the online poker sites would be sending far fewer satellite winners. The first over/under line I heard was 5,000. Others put it as high as 7,000. All agreed that the number would be less than last year’s total, and they were right. After three and a half days of play, the official number of entrants was just announced: 6,358.

While this is 2,415 below last year’s total, it is also 739 higher than that of 2005. In its 38-year history the World Series of Poker has shown an amazing ability to grow. In fact, it has only experience a decline in numbers from one year to the next once. In 1991, 215 players entered the main event; in 1992, only 201 did. Such growth has always been a major part of the event’s mystique. Some years, when it appeared that the numbers would decline, the Binion family would buy players into the event directly or develop means for them to do so on their own. This is the origin of satellites. When it appeared that the numbers were going to decline in 1982, Eric Drache, then the tournament director, convinced a table full of players to put up $1,000 apiece and play a one-table satellite that awarded one seat to the winner.

So what are we to make of this year’s decline? I have heard some people, mostly those who are in the business of making money off the poker industry, who are treating it as if it were the end of the world. They feel the public will get a false image of the game’s demise, believing that the poker “fad” is over. But why should you or I care about that? The only other entity that has any interest in this is Harrah’s. Fewer players means fewer bucks put into their coffers—last year Jamie Gold made $12 million while Harrah’s came in second, making more money than the runner-up Paul Wasicka. Are we to feel sorry for this monstrous corporation? Hell no. Should we feel sorry for this year’s winner who will be taking home a mere $8.25 million? Once again, hell no. I’ll probably never know first-hand but I can’t imagine that there is a very big difference between possessing $8 million and $12 million. At that point it’s just a number on a computer screen.

While the mainstream press might try to argue that poker is in the decline, every one here inside the Rio knows differently. All it takes is one quick look inside the Gaming Expo to see that poker is doing just fine, thank you very much, and it’s here to stay. As I mentioned before, there is now an entire poker industry: books, DVDs, energy drinks, tables, dealer buttons, t-shirts, and $10,000 buy-in tournaments every where you look. The average guy on the street knows what a flop is and Phil Ivey is nearly as recognizable as Michael Jordan ever was. Five years ago there were a handful of journalists who covered the World Series of Poker; this week over 600 journalists from every corner of the world will be camped out in the Rio’s media room. 6,358 seems like the perfect number to me. I actually can’t imagine how much more congested and crazy this place would be with 2,000 more players in the tournament. Then again it will be a momentous day when 10,000 players enter the tournament for the first time. I am quite sure it will happen, but if it never does that’s fine by me. The basic structure of this event will never change: countless players will arrive with their dreams and one of them will leave very happy and very wealthy.

 
 
0 Comments

Hellmuth Arrives


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 18:03:38 on Jul 09, 2007

Phil Hellmuth just arrived, and in grand style too. Having (supposedly) wrecked the Ultimate Bet sports car, he stepped out of a limo moments ago wearing a NASCAR-style black racing suit with his name and that of his many sponsors splashed all over it. He was accompanied by a retinue of similarly dressed women (dressed similar to him and each other). There were eleven in all, a nod to his having won eleven bracelets. Hellmuth stood in the center of the hallway with his racing helmet tucked under one arm as hundreds of photographers and film crews captured his (ridiculous) image. I am trying to imagine some of the past champions like Johnny Moss or Jack Straus ever pulling such a stunt, and I just can’t.

While I have always admired Hellmuth’s boldness, laughing off the first several rounds of the most important poker tournament of the year as a way of proving what a master of the game he is, I am starting to question his sanity. What kind of many would voluntarily play poker in what amounts to a flashy mechanic’s outfit. “This is worse than Jeff Madsen having to play in a jester costume,” said a member of the media. “He did it because he lost a bet. Hellmuth is doing this because…” Her voice trailed off. Why was he doing this?

Well, mostly to foist his products onto the consumers of America. When he’s not selling them on the idea of playing online poker at Ultimate Bet, he’s pushing his books and DVDs on them, and now he’s got a new line of energy drink whose name I refuse to say lest you feel compelled to go buy some. Hellmuth doesn’t need any more money. What he needs is a few more people whose opinions he respects to tell him he’s an idiot. Somehow that message isn’t getting through to him.

3 Comments

Daniel Negreanu on Day 1D


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 17:24:14 on Jul 09, 2007

Say what you want about Phil Hellmuth, but you can’t deny he’s entertaining. The man isn’t afraid to open his mouth, which generally—but certainly not always—makes for good theater. I plan on spending some time peeking over his shoulder at some point during the day, but he has to get here first. As is his habit, his seat remains empty an hour and a half into Day 1D. There’s a rumor swirling that yesterday he wrecked a race car sponsored by Ultimate Bet in the Rio’s parking lot. I am sure I will hear all about it. In the meantime I have had to make do with watching Daniel Negreanu. Not a bad second choice.

Negreanu is one of my favorite players to sweat because he likes to yak it up at the table and get involved in a lot of pots. He also has the amazing ability to make friends with everyone at the table while at the same time taking all their chips. During the first level of play today, he popped out of his chair and jogged to the other side of the table to see what one of his opponents was reading. Turns out it was Harrington on Hold’em. “I’ve never read it,” Negreanu told the kid. “Does he tell you how to beat me?” I have a feeling he was fishing for more information than that. On the very next hand he opened for a raise and the kid popped him 1k more. “I know one thing,” Negreanu said as he mucked his cards. “My hand doesn’t match up very well with yours.”

Fellow Canadian Brad Booth stopped by a moment later to relay the news that he’d just been knocked out. “Just lost with aces,” he said. Negreanu, who was proudly sporting a bright red Canadian hockey jersey, nodded and went back to studying the player on his right who looked like he was trying to steal a pot with nothing more than position. The player had bet the river after it got checked to him twice and two blanks had fallen. Did he really have a hand or was he just taking a stab at it? On the very next hand that same player raised from the button and Negreanu reraised him from the small blind. His opponent called and the flop came AsJh7h. Negreanu bet 1.5k and his opponent folded. Had he picked up some information while staring at his opponent on the previous hand? It sure looked like it.

Several hands later, Negreanu raised 250 from late position. The standard opening raise for most players at this level is 300, three times the size of the big blind, but Negreanu has been raising 50 less. I believe he does this because he wants to get called. He’s not looking to steal the blinds at this level. He wants to build a pot and outplay his opponents on the flop and beyond. Sure enough, he got a caller on this hand and the flop came Kh9h8s. Both players checked. The 10s fell on the turn and Negreanu bet 2.5k. His opponent called. The 4h came on the river, and his opponent led out for a 4k bet. Negreanu threw his hands in the air in frustration. At that point about ten press people rushed over. Negreanu then proceeded to do something that appears to be the lone weakness of his game but may actually be a strength. Very much aware that he was beaten, he called anyway. This is how he confirms his reads. As long as he still has chips to work with, it can be effective because he might win a much bigger pot off this opponent later on down the road when winning pots becomes even more important. His opponent showed him Ah2h, which gave him the nut flush. Negreanu showed the Qh and mucked his other card. Another guy at the table asked what the other card was. “A four,” Negreanu joked. I have to assume he made the nut straight on the turn with Q-J and didn’t have a queen-high flush on the end as he surely would have semi-bluffed with his flush draw on the flop.

The very next hand he raised a limper to 350. The limper asked, “You on tilt?” “I am,” Negreanu answered. “Absolutely.” After As3h8h flopped, he bet 650, and his opponent folded. Negreanu showed AhQh. “Not a bad flop for me,” he said, obviously not on tilt.

2 Comments

1525
5