Tags
    

Auto Refresh: Off (Turn On)

Currently Viewing Articles tagged with, harrah's

Wandering Around on Day 1B and Further Reflections on Dead Money


Author: Jeremiah Smith Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 00:54:02 on Jul 08, 2007

There are two clear advantages to not doing live updates and chip counts during the 2007 WSOP: 1) I don't want to commit seppuku at the end of the day and 2) I can wander the tournament floor looking for whatever stories may be lurking.  I love wandering without an agenda, letting both casual conversations with both pros and other writers determine my path through the tournament floor.

The first guy I stumbled into was Vincent Procopio, an east coast grinder who just "don't give a @&#$."   This through and through Jersey boy has been a lifelong friend of Johhny "World" Hennigan. Vinny was one bad beat from the TV final table at the LAPC.

Usually the big personalities crave the limelight, but all Vinny cares about is the bottom line: "I don't give a @&$# about no bracelet.  I don't give a @&$# about getting on TV.  I just want the money."  In a world where bluffing gets you by, what you see is what you get with Vinny. 

After a few nice runs during the spring, his presence has been noticeably missing this summer.  Vinny pointed out one of the reasons he stays away from the WSOP. "I feel like I'm getting raped in the ass then afterwards I'm given a box of chocolates like it was a nice date or something.  Come on, you take out $600 for an entry fee and juice the prize pool, then give me a $10 voucher for food?"

After wishing Vinny good luck in the event, I made my way inside the Amazon Room where, with three minutes to go before the cards were in the air, I did not recognize a soul.  While the room was full of players, I counted exactly zero familiar faces.  It has been fascinating watching the professionals show up later and later to each event.  Finally, with two minutes to spare, I saw John Juanda taking his seat.  Maybe there's something to learn from a late arrival; John was one of the days first casualties.

I soon learned why the pros waited to make their appearance.  Media Director Nolan Dalla (who has an amazing work ethic and an even better personality) introduced Tournament Director Jack Effel who wished everyone a "Happy Main Event!" Weird.  This was followed by a commercial for Corum watches, the official bracelet provider of the WSOP.  This commercial was followed by an unusually concise Penn Jilliette who announced, "Uhhhhhh.....Shuffle up and deal!" (which was, in actually, another commercial for an act that just happens to take place at the Rio).

Two of the people I always look for are BJ Nemeth and Dr. Pauly.  While there's a lot of people who think they're good at reporting, these guys actually are.  BJ's type-A personality mixed with extreme OCD seems to be the perfect formula for the world's best final table reporter.  BJ never lets his opinion get in the way of reporting what's actually happening.  If I ever need to know a fact or a detail, he's the man to ask.  On the flip side, Pauly never lets reporting the facts get in the way of his opinion.  Paul writes one of the best poker blogs on the 'net, and anytime I need to know the latest dirt, he's the man to ask.

After bugging Pauly for a bit, it was apparent that dead money can be broken down into a few categories

1. Dead Dead Money
These players just don't have a freaking clue and might as  well get out some poker chips, spray kerosene on a brick of $10,000, light a match and call it a day.

2. Dead Money That Learned How to Play by Watching Hoyt Corkins on TV
These players have a lot of variety in their game:

  • "All in."
  • "I'm all in."
  • "I'll put you all in."

3. Dead Money That Learned How to Play by Watching Daniel Negreanu on TV
I watched a player reraise to 1.8k when the blinds were 50-100 and bet 6k on a K84 flop, then proudly turn over 64 offsuit to show that he knows how to play any two cards, just like "Kid Poker."  Except Daniel plays these in position.  And he relies on his years of experience and uncanny reading ability to outplay people postflop.  Which I guess is kind of like making ridiculous raises preflop and silly ginormous big bets on painted flops.  But not really.

1 Comment

Anyone Can Win a Bracelet


Author: Jeremiah Smith Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 21:34:33 on Jun 23, 2007

It seems like players have an incessant stream of complaints about Harrah's.  Combine that with the grind of tournament after tournament and it's easy to become a bit jaded covering this poker monstrosity called the WSOP (I think you can hear the growing angst in our pro blogs). In an earlier post, I talked about some of the reasons why I both love and hate tournament poker, but today I have been reminded of everything that's great about the WSOP.

I drove to the airport last night to pick up a friend who will be playing in his first series.  His excitement was contagious, and was a welcome reminder of what makes the World Series of Poker so special.

Anyone can win a bracelet.

By anyone, I mean players like Ciaran O’Leary of Seattle, WA.  According to the Hendon Mob database, he has a lifetime cash total of $727,012.  Which came in one event—the first of several $1,500 No-Limit Holdem WSOP tournaments.  O’Leary’s first place finish has become a common theme at the 2007 WSOP.

Take Jason Warner from Vancouver, for instance.  He won the $1,500 No-Limit Holdem event 12.  Warner now has exactly one cash.

David Stucke has also cashed one time.  For a bracelet in Event 27, another $1,500 No-Limit Holdem tournament.

Dan Baruch’s (winner of the $1,500 NL Shootout) total cashes: One. 

Mike Spegal defeated Gavin Smith heads-up in the $1,500 Pot-Limit Holdem event.  He also has—you guessed it—one cash.

On the eve of every $1,500 holdem event, you can find a registration line of dream-chasers winding it’s way outside of the Amazon room.  Eavesdropping on their phone calls to a buddy from the home game reveals everything that’s wonderful about the World Series of Poker:

“Yeah, I’m still standing in line…oh, wow, you won’t believe this.  I just saw The Grinder.  Yeah, he was talking to Erick Lindgren…wow…@#$!…they could be at my table.”

Over the next few hours, those phone calls will begin to slightly change in tone as they gain confidence along with their chips.  “Dude, I just doubled up with aces!  I’ve got like, I don’t know, forty thousand now! We’re almost in the money…”  After winning a few races and making it through Day 1, the dreams begin to fade as reality sets in.

Anyone can win a bracelet.

Looking for a pro at the beginning of a Day 2 field in one of these events is akin to playing “Where’s Waldo?”; familiar faces are hard to find in a sea of newcomers.  There’s plenty of fish still swimming in this sea; I witness an open-push of thirty big blinds with pocket eights and an overcall by ace-jack.  The winner of the hand is irrelevant as they are both just trying to make their first cash The Big One.

It’s unfortunate that the new blind structure make luck play even more of a role than normal at this stage.  Unfortunate for the post-flop pros, that is.  Luck levels the playing field even more for the player who went from asking Chris Ferguson for his autograph to wishing Jesus well after sending him to the rail.

For everything that Harrah’s has done wrong, they have made one of the world’s greatest games easily accessible to the everyman.  I understand why some pros argue that churning out bracelets at an assembly line pace actually detracts from their value.  But try telling that to Jason Warner. Or David Stucke.  Or Ciarin O’Leary.  Imagine what that final phone call to the home-game buddy must have sounded like to them…

0 Comments

A Removed Perspective


Author: Storms Reback
Published on: 22:50:39 on Jun 07, 2007

Because I dove straight into the action right when I got here yesterday, I have yet to take a step back and examine this scene from an unattached (as much as that’s possible) perspective. With my small bankroll currently quite a bit smaller, I believe now is the time to take a step back and muse.

First, I have nothing bad to say about Harrah’s, the new cards, the lines to register for events, or any other controversy that (for some) tarnished the first week of the Series. All that seems to have been cleaned up, and the ship appears to be maintaining an even keel. I will even go so far as to praise Harrah’s for the Amazon Room’s new look. At the end of the 2006 WSOP I wrote an article for All In magazine that criticized the new patrons of the tournament for not having provided a spiffy enough homage to past champions. The best they could do last year was a single large sheet of plastic hanging from the rafters. This year there are twenty-foot-tall banners exhibiting photos of every past champ hanging from the ceiling all around the perimeter of the room. One of these banners bears a giant question mark—meaning: insert the face and name of the 2007 champ here. It’s an extremely impressive display, almost museum-worthy.

Second, I am already sick of watching and playing Texas hold’em. One of my favorite moments of the Series so far came while I was watching the $5,000 Pot-Limit Omaha with ReBuys final table yesterday. After watching the action for fifteen minutes of so, a woman sitting directly behind got confused when the action finally progressed all the way to the river and two players’ hands were shown. They each had four cards! “Is this Texas hold’em?” she asked. When someone told her she was watching Omaha, you could have stuck an entire fist in her mouth. She couldn’t have been more confused if someone told her they were playing Go Fish. She vacated the final table area immediately afterwards. 

There seems to be a lot more media coverage this year—who are all these people camped out in the media room?—but only a small percentage of them have the means to follow the action up close and personal, so what is everyone doing here? In the absence of real information wild rumors have been swirling around the tournament floor. Does anyone know where Vinny Vinh is? The chip leader at one point during the $1,000 No-Limit Hold’em with ReBuys event, Vinny suddenly disappeared. With his large stack slowly getting blinded off, he ended up finishing 20th, but if any of the rumors surrounding his absence are true there will be no celebrating for Vinny. One scenario has him being extremely ill—supposedly he looked terrible when he was last spotted. An offshoot rumor of that one has him laid up in a hospital room, cancer being the cause. But in an inverse of logic the most outlandish scenario is the one being most widely embraced. Vinny got whacked by some people he owed a lot of money to! That’s right. The consensus in the Amazon Room right now is that Vinny Vinh is dead. Ask anyone.

With the lounges sponsored by the various online poker rooms not here this year, getting access to the top pros seems harder than ever. I will catch a glimpse of a player I want to talk to from across the room and while heading in that direction said player will suddenly vanish. They’re like ghosts. Here comes Phil Ivey drifting down the hallway and then—poof—he steps through a concrete wall and is gone. Evidently the place to catch up with them is the VIP Lounge. The only catch is that a $1,000 donation is required for entry. Not sure Poker Wire would be very happy if I billed them for that… but it’s worth a try.

1 Comment

Harrah's is the Divorced Dad


Author: Michael Craig Tournament: 2007 WSOP
Published on: 18:10:44 on Jun 04, 2007

I think I understand why Harrah's is screwing up so much at this World Series.

And just so it's clear, Harrah's IS screwing up so much at this World Series.

I think other people are writing this, too, but here is a partial list:

* The registration process - It took hours and hours for people to register and buy in to the first few events. That may have abated but as far as customer service and first impressions, it was a gigantic negative. It's all the more puzzling because this is the third year Harrah's has run the WSOP at the Rio. How could they not be prepared, or not anticipate problems, or not have something better than last year?

* The payment process - I had to spend about an hour and a half after I busted out of the $1500 NLHE to get paid, and it was a miserable wait. First, I had to go upstairs to the back part of the Final Table Studio. Why they situated Step A of payouts where they hold final tables, WHILE A FINAL TABLE WAS GOING ON, is a mystery. Then a person escorted me and five others out of the Amazon Room and across a hallway to a series of offices with the sign "Payouts." My information (including my driver's license and players card, so I didn't have the option of just leaving and trying at some later time) was handed to someone behind a desk and I was told to wait out in the hall. After more than a half hour, my name was called and I was led to a desk. The clerk then took down my information - the same information I provided when I registered the day before - by hand on a printed form. They had a bank of computers in the room and individual computers in front of each desk, but they must have been props. It was all done pen-to-paper. After this, I was led back to the Amazon Room to a line of people at the cashier's cage. At the end of THAT line, I finally got paid. Again, they've done this for two complete WSOPs. Why is it like this after all that experience?

* The cards - To remedy the problem of playing cards with the durability of toilet paper in 2006, they decided each table would each day have a fresh deck of cards. They even came up with a "special design." Unfortunately, the special design was unreadable and there were numerous conspicuous errors - suits were almost impossible to divine, sixes and nines were difficult to distinguish. They replaced the cards with new ones after the dinner break on Saturday night.

* Parking - This is my personal problem. All the spaces closest to the convention center have been turned over to the valet. The best self-park space is further from the door than the worst valet space.

* Round for hand - Last year, they came up with a great idea to substitute for the interminable hand-for-hand delays at the bubble. They played round-for-round, designating a certain number of hands and having each dealer deal them out and stop after reaching that number. Every person eliminated in that round was deemed eliminated at the same time. It sped things up, the players liked it. It was smart and innovative. So when I got to the bubble last night, what did they do? Hand-for-hand. It took about a half hour to play five hands. Why did they stop doing something that worked so well last year?

I swear, sometimes the operators of the World Series are like the guy from Memento; every day they wake up with no memory of anything that came before.

BUT ... and this is a big but: They have done several things well.

* Commitment to charity - They score huge on this. They came through in a big way for Ante Up for Africa, the $5000 buy-in tournament on July 5, hosted by Annie Duke and Don Cheadle, for education about and relief for the victims of genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan. Phil Gordon told me they were great with his Bad Beat on Cancer. And the VIP Lounge hosted by the Nevada Cancer Institute got a great assist from the Rio. The Lounge is supercool, with food, drinks, couches, TVs, and a putting green. It also comes with valet parking access as well as use of Rio facilities like the pool and the gym. It costs $1000, all of which is a donation to the Nevada Cancer Institute. ALL OF IT. That means that Rio comped everything - the food, the space, all the amenities.

* They fixed the playing card problem - After some monster mess-ups on Day 1 of Events 1 & 2 on Friday, they had U.S. Playing Card Co. ship them new cards with a standard design and they were in play by the end of the dinner break on Saturday. When Jeffrey Pollack announced this at the start of play on Saturday, he was booed. But he and Harrah's were very stand-up about it. They tried to correct a problem from last year. They tried to do something "extra" - make the cards more player-friendly. They ended up botching it up. I don't know if they didn't test the design or they trusted U.S. Playing Card Co. when they shouldn't have, but it was obvious after one second that the cards were unusable without major risk of error. But then they fixed it as fast as they could. And Pollack stood there knowing the players were going to boo him, and they didn't let him down.

* Final Table Studio - That's my name for it but they set up a final table area that is designed to accommodate live spectators. The last two years, the final table was situated to ESPN's needs and they clearly didn't care about the live audience. I haven't looked very closely at what they did, but it looks nice. The Amazon Room in general looks better and B.J. Nemeth, final-table journalist and photographer extraordinare, told me the lighting is a lot better this year.

And there are some good things (as well as some bad things I missed).

After three full days on site, though, I now get it. Harrah's is the newly-divorced dad.

You know how the newly-divorced dad takes you to the ballgame but doesn't pay the dentist bill? How he gets you the new video game system but acts all squirrely about paying his half of the camp fees? That's Harrah's.

Harrah's seems interested in going out of its way to be the cool dad - charity, making the playing cards special, sprucing up the final table - and they clearly care. But they don't understand that the most important thing about being a dad is to be dependable and responsible.

I hope they eventually get it. They make a lot of money off this, which is fine. But if this is truly "A Franchise," they need to be dependable and responsible. It's not about whether they'll spend money or not spend money - they spent money on some of the nice things they've done and they've even spent money on some of the lousy things they've done. It's about making it a priority to do well at the thankless tasks that you never get credit for doing well, but catch heat when you do it poorly.

I have my doubts because this is the second, third, or fourth year for this crew, depending on how you definte "crew". In any event, they are not rookies. But the fact that they are trying means there's hope. And poker players complain all the time, but they are also suckers for hope.

Addendum - After writing this, I was with Shannon Elizabeth when she bought in for tomorrow's $1500 LHE event. (Oh yeah, I'll be writing that ASAP.) There was an issue about the WSOP release; apparently someone forgot to have her sign it before the other events she played. In time, Ty Stewart and Jeffrey Pollack were involved and it got worked out. I was standing next to Shannon at the cage and, though Ty and Jeffrey - okay, Stewart and Pollack - didn't acknowledge my presence, I was right there with a media badge and they never asked me to leave or asked Shannon if they could discuss it with her privately.

Contrast this to an identical situation that arose involving Chris Ferguson and Steve Lipscombe. Before the 2006 WPT Championship, Ferguson was hopeful that issues with the WPT's release were going to be worked out. They weren't and he wasn't allowed to play. Lipscombe was supposed to discuss what went wrong with Chris, and Chris (standing outside the tournament area with me) called out to Steve as he exited the Fontana Bar at the Bellagio. Yes, Lipscombe said, they could discuss it. "Come on with me," he said. Chris asked me to come along. When Steve heard that, he exploded. "You expect me to talk about it with HIM listening?" He was furious and walked away fast, yelling at Ferguson. As far as I know, that was their last conversation before Chris sued the WPT.

Either the WSOP people are not paranoid lunatics like their counterparts at the WPT ... or they didn't notice my media badge.

(I should also say that the WSOP release is much, much different from the WPT's. Apart from dispensing with the "throughout the Universe" language in the WPT release, it seems encompassing and harsh, but only (I think - I admit that I signed mine without looking at it) about using the player's performance for its performance and to promote the performance and the WSOP. Near as I can tell, they language doesn't allow them to use your image to hustle people off the street to play at a St. Louis casino or put your face on a slot machine.)

2 Comments

1099
1